Robert Allen (syndicated columnist)
New York (RAP) June 13, 2014 - Fr. David Duke, a liaison of the public relations office of the Archdiocese of New York, generously consented to grant us an interview today over the events surrounding the dismissal of Fr. Justin Wylie from the Archdiocese of New York.
Robert Allen: Fr. Duke, I want to thank you for your generosity in allowing time in your busy schedule at the chancery offices to meet with us here today. As you know, the internet has gone viral with stories about the Cardinal's dismissal of Fr. Wylie.
Fr. David Duke: It's my pleasure to meet with you. Yes, but let me make one thing clear at the outset. It was not the Cardinal himself who dismissed Fr. Wylie. It was the Cardinal's "office," as reported in Rorate Caeli. The Cardinal himself knew nothing of this whole affair.
R.A.: A little background may be helpful here. Can you tell us a little about Fr. Wylie? Who is he? Where's he from?
Fr. D.D.: Yes, of course. Fr. Wylie is a priest of the Archdiocese of Johannesburg, South Africa, who, until very recently, had been on assignment in New York City as attaché to the Holy See’s Permanent Observer Mission to the United Nations.
R.A.: How was Fr. Wylie involved with the Archdiocese of New York?
Fr. D.D.: Well, he was here, of course, by permission of the Archbishop of New York, and he also filled in for us as an occasional celebrant at some of our Sunday liturgies at churches around the city. In fact, he proved to be an extremely popular preacher.
R.A.: Why was he dismissed, then? What was the problem?
Fr. D.D.: Well, a few eyebrows were raised initially before he was came to New York when we were contacted by his own archdiocese with a request that we would grant him preaching assignments in nigger parishes.
R.A.: Excuse me? Do you mean African-American parishes?
Fr. D.D.: No, I'm sorry. I wasn't referring to colored people. I was referring to those upstart throwbacks that ought to be bulldozed into the waste dump of history, you know, traditionalists?
R.A.: So Fr. Wylie was serving parishes that wish to offer the traditional Latin Mass?
Fr. D.D.: Yes, in fact, the Archdiocese of New York kindly consented to let him serve, as was his wish, at nigger liturgies three times a month at the Church of St. Agnes and once a month at the Church of the Holy Innocents.
R.A.: This was a problem for the Cardinal Archbishop?
Fr. D.D.: As I mentioned, the Cardinal knew nothing about this. Certainly there was not much anyone in the chancery offices could do about it, given the need for diplomatic courtesies in our age of political correctness and all. What I mean is that while we have every desire to see that the demands of social justice are fulfilled in every corner of the Archdiocese [of New York].... You know, if these people want their nigger liturgies, of course they can have them. But the idea that anyone would want actually sit down and to break bread wish these people, you know, to use the same water fountains and toilets with them, much less participate in their style of worship. Well, to each his own, I guess.
R.A.: So why wasn't Fr. Wylie allowed to continue serving in his New York assignments? Were there complaints from parishioners? Was he discovered to be a closet pederast? What gives?
Fr. D.D.: No, no [laughing]. St. Francis Xavier is our pederast parish. Queers are very much welcomed there, as the Cardinal himself has indicated.
No, Fr. Wylie is so straight he makes Arnold Schwartznegger look like a queer. In fact, he's probably what you would call a top-drawer priest in any diocese, except for maybe his incomprehensible desire to fraternize with nigger Mass lovers. The straw that broke the camel's back was the homily he preached on May 18th at Holy Innocents.
R.A.: Was there a point of orthdoxy in question?
Fr. D.D.: Not really. You couldn't ask for more "orthodox" homilies, so orthodox, in fact, they'd probably set John Kerry's teeth on edge, if you know what I mean. It was more a case of fatal indiscretion. He crossed the line.
R.A.: What do you mean? I thought the homily was an exhortation to charity.
Fr. D.D.: Yes, but he crossed the line: he suggested that there was an urgent need in the Archdiocese to provide regular pastors sympathetic to nigger liturgies to serve and guide their parishes. It's one thing to allow niggers to show up occasionally in a food line in one of your soup kitchens, but another thing altogether to build houses for them right here in our neighbourhoods. Good heavens, before you know it, their kids will be sharing the same playgrounds with ours!
R.A.: Just to be clear, then, you're saying that Fr. Wylie was not dismissed for any defect of doctrine or discipline or character, but simply because he was urging a more charitable support for parishes that provide the traditional Latin liturgy?
Fr. D.D.: Putting it that way makes us seem like the bad guys, which wouldn't be right. All we want is to preserve the purity of our liturgies in the Archdiocese, to keep them, you know, white.
R.A.: As you know, the Archdiocese recently announced, in April, I believe, that it is planning to shut down a large number of parishes. As you also know, Holy Innocents is a thriving parish with a large and enthusiastic constituency, with multiple Sunday Masses, weekday Masses, and, as I understand, the sacrament of Confession available nearly around the clock. Is Holy Innocents slated for closure?
Fr. D.D.: I'm sure you understand that I'm not free to divulge that information. However, as they say, and I'm going to stand by my statement unlike those craven journalists that want to keep anything controversial "off the record," you know ... and so I'm going to say loud and clear: The only good liturgical nigger is a dead liturgical nigger. Not literally of course. But you know what I mean. These guys would bring back the Spanish Inquisition if you let them!
No comments:
Post a Comment